Talk:Range expansion: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
Line 58: Line 58:


but there seems to be no obvious source/representation of that zero in the range expression,
but there seems to be no obvious source/representation of that zero in the range expression,
and the outputs of the first few code examples that I have looked duly generate no zero …
and the outputs of the first few code examples that I have looked at duly generate no zero …


So perhaps a typo ? Or have I missed something in the discussions above ?
So perhaps a typo ? Or have I missed something in the discussions above ?