Talk:Range expansion: Difference between revisions

Talk:Range expansion (view source)

417 bytes added , 8 years ago

m

Reply to question

Anonymous user

Revision as of 02:03, 24 November 2015 (view source) Hout (talk \| contribs) (→‎Undetected intruder in the example range ?) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 02:18, 24 November 2015 (view source) rosettacode>Jnd m (Reply to question)
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 51: ==Undetected intruder in the example range ?== I notice that the example given ~~lists~~ includes a zero in 5th position: -6, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 Line 58: but there seems to be no obvious source/representation of that zero in the range expression, and the outputs of the first few code examples that I have looked at duly generate no zero … So perhaps a typo ? Or have I missed something in the discussions above ? [[User:Hout\|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout\|talk]]) 02:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC) : 0 is part of "-3-1" --[[User:Jnd\|Jnd]] ([[User talk:Jnd\|talk]]) 02:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Got it – so the difference between the requested expansion (-3--1) and the example (-3-1), is presumably intentional ? [[User:Hout\|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout\|talk]]) 02:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC) : Yep, I think the Note has been there for years --[[User:Jnd\|Jnd]] ([[User talk:Jnd\|talk]]) 02:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)