Anonymous user
Talk:Range consolidation: Difference between revisions
Similar.
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (boundary included / not included notation?) |
(Similar.) |
||
Line 19:
Are the boundaries included in the range? What notation is used to describe ranges with the opposite boundary properties? E.G. [2,4] - boundaries included; (2,4) - boundaries not included; [2,4) - lower boundary included, upper boundary not included, etc. Really, it seems like this is just a version of the [[Set_of_real_numbers]] task, except no operator requirement. The range building logic could be lifted directly though --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Thundergnat, I state "covering all numbers between and including both bounds"; (other bounds not used in the task). It could be similar to the task you mention. A quick look leaves me wondering if this consolidation could use the operators mentioned? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 15:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
| |||