Talk:Range consolidation: Difference between revisions
boundary included / not included notation?
(More info.) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (boundary included / not included notation?) |
||
Line 17:
:My thoughts on automatically testing are to generate random sets of ranges on, say, a grid of x=0.5 then ensure that all points in the range on a grid of x/2. are similarly ex/included by the random input, and consolidated output ranges - or some such.
:--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 10:02, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Are the boundaries included in the range? What notation is used to describe ranges with the opposite boundary properties? E.G. [2,4] - boundaries included; (2,4) - boundaries not included; [2,4) - lower boundary included, upper boundary not included, etc. Really, it seems like this is just a version of the [[Set_of_real_numbers]] task, except no operator requirement. The range building logic could be lifted directly though --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
| |||