Anonymous user
Talk:Railway circuit: Difference between revisions
additional solutions?
m (added header) |
(additional solutions?) |
||
Line 47:
--[[User:G.Brougnard|G.Brougnard]] ([[User talk:G.Brougnard|talk]]) 08:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
: Thank you. I didn't have the two first ones, with the overlapping tracks. So now I do have 35 for C24 based on i + 6 symmetry. I've found 5 additional solutions, however, based on a 3-way symmetry of i + 4. They look valid to me, unless I've misunderstood the criteria:
<pre>1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1
1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1
1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1
1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1
1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1</pre>
<br>
[[File:Railway_circuits_additional.gif]]<br>
[[User:Fwend|Fwend]] ([[User talk:Fwend|talk]]) 22:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
| |||