Anonymous user
Talk:RSA code: Difference between revisions
→Draft: direction of headings ...
(→New/Modified Tasks and Categories: new cat and moving sub-discussion) |
(→Draft: direction of headings ...) |
||
Line 17:
--[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 02:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
===Library or Implementation? The direction of PicoLisp===
Again we need to settle on a definition before too many people add solutions. Just calling a library may be a valid task but it doesn't fit the original task description or the alternate started in GO. A similar debate was held in [[MD5]] and [[MD5/Implementation]]. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 10:15, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
:* I think a warning on the main page is due. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 10:15, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
===The direction of GO===
: Deliberately so. :) With the task in draft status I thought I would mix things up with some different ideas, and thought I would start with some code as an illustration. So in no particular order here, I was thinking a number of things.
:* The task has potential to get uncomfortably large and multi-faceted. I wanted to see if I could write something compact. (Well, as Go code goes. I know Go tends to run long in LOC.)
| |||