Talk:RC POP.OUT: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:RC POP.OUT (view source)

Revision as of 05:05, 6 May 2019

2,959 bytes added , 5 years ago

m

→‎Category vs. solution: added a comment.

Anonymous user

rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger

Revision as of 23:38, 10 February 2019 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger (→‎Mathmatica vs Wolfram Language: added spelling corrections, extended some comments.) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 05:05, 6 May 2019 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (→‎Category vs. solution: added a comment.)
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 149: <br> If you meant   '''Mathematica''',   then yes, the   '''24 game'''   is included in the count for   '''Mathematica'''.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 23:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Line 170: I prefer the global script change method   (or by hand),   as this will help consolidate the computer programming language name and would have less confusion to those that think that the two programming languages are distinct entities.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 23:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC) I just noticed that some Rosetta Code tasks that have   '''Mathematica'''   also have (in conjunction)   '''Wolfram Language'''   <br>(in the same   <big> <nowiki> =={{header\|Mathematica / Wolfram Language}}== </nowiki> </big>   header). In that case, each specified language would have it's '''members''' count to be included, so that it appears that in this case, it can appear as double-counting   (in a global total sense).     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 23:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Also, as a by-product of having two computer programming languages specified in the <br>  <big> <nowiki> =={{header\|Mathematica / Wolfram Language}}== </nowiki> </big>   header,   it would appear like there was an entry for each of the two languages specified, thus my comment about double counting.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 00:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC) :See my musing on this subject (from last September) here: [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code:Village_Pump/Whoa!_10000_examples!#Lies.2C_damned_lies_and_statistics Lies, damned lies, and statistics] --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 00:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC) == Category vs. solution == In the latest version of the page you added the line: <blockquote>Only computer programming languages that have at least one programming solution are listed.</blockquote> but that is not the case. If it is, please point out a link to '''any''' programming solution for '''any''' of the following: [[Script Basic]] [[.QL]] [[8 1/2]] [[A+]] [[Agda2]] [[ALGOL]] [[Alice ML]] [[ANT]] [[Application Master]] [[ASP]] [[ASP.Net]] [[AspectC++]] [[Axum]] [[B]] [[Beta]] [[C0H]] [[Caml]] [[CB80]] [[Cecil]] [[Cilk]] [[Cilk++]] [[Datalog]] [[Diesel]] [[Elan]] [[Euler]] [[FAUST]] [[FeatureC++]] [[FPI]] [[FreeMat]] [[Goo]] [[Jabaco]] [[KeyList Databasing]] [[L.in.oleum]] [[Lotus 123 Macro Scripting]] [[Lout]] [[M680x0]] [[ME10 macro]] [[MGS]] [[Mirelle]] [[Mython]] [[Nice]] [[NQP]] [[OpenC++]] [[Pentium Assembly]] [[PLUS]] [[PLZ/SYS]] [[PPC Assembly]] [[PPL]] [[QuakeC]] [[Refal]] [[RLSL]] [[RTSL]] [[Script3D]] [[Superbase BASIC]] [[TAL]] [[TeLa]] [[Thistle]] [[UScript]] [[UserRPL]] [[VRML]] [[WML]] [[Xbase]] [[CHR]] [[MAPPER]] RC POP.OUT is a count of ''categories'' '''not''' ''programming solutions''. BTW, there are 639 languages with at least one solution on the site. --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 00:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC) : Sorry for the misquote.   I should've mentioned ''members'', not programming solutions.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 05:04, 6 May 2019 (UTC)