Anonymous user
Talk:Quaternion type: Difference between revisions
→Imaginary parts (plural): Que?
(→Imaginary parts (plural): Que?) |
|||
Line 119:
: You might say that since the Julia library provides real(_), it ought to provide accessor functions for each of the imaginary components, but that should perhaps be the subject of discussion between you and the good people at Julia. I've checked the most recent Julia library, and the same accessor functions ("real" and "imag") are still defined there. The choice of the name "imag" for the "i" component has four letters, just like "real", and is really unobjectionable. [[User:Peak|Peak]] ([[User talk:Peak|talk]]) 19:28, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Peak, imag looks like it was probably forgotten from extending imaginary numbers to their implementation for quaternions. It jq is based on the Julia entry, could you state its use? Maybe there is no use for this in Julia either? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 19:52, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
| |||