Talk:Quaternion type: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 18:48, 10 August 2014 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎Imaginary parts (plural): how would imagine be used?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:49, 10 August 2014 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 m (→‎Imaginary parts (plural): how would imag be used?) Newer edit →
Line 112:		Line 112:

	::Hi, Looking through the function names are came across image. It just seemed wrong to access only one of the three imaginary parts of a quaternion via that name - especially when the other imaginary parts seem to be adjacent indices away.		::Hi, Looking through the function names are came across image. It just seemed wrong to access only one of the three imaginary parts of a quaternion via that name - especially when the other imaginary parts seem to be adjacent indices away.
	::Why the use of the name? What would ~~imagine~~ be used for? It seems odd to single out I over j over k in such a way. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 18:48, 10 August 2014 (UTC)		::Why the use of the name? What would imag be used for? It seems odd to single out I over j over k in such a way. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 18:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)