Talk:QBasic: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4:
: As I recall, QBASIC and QuickBasic were different branches of the same implementation of the same derivative language of BASIC. The chief difference I remember was that QuickBasic had a compiler built-in. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 03:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
::Not even different branches, really. I imagine that they might very well have built QBasic from the QuickBasic sources by using defines or even something in the makefile. (QuickBasic 4.5 has some things that QBasic doesn't, mostly related to asm, includes, command$ (QB's version of argv[], sorta), and some memory stuff.) -- [[User:Eriksiers|Eriksiers]] 16:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
:There are a few differences for the user: 1/ QBasic was free and available with MS-DOS and later with Windows 95 (on an
|