Talk:Proper divisors: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Dupe?: Chime in |
|||
Line 8:
:::OK. I understand your point. I have just added the third of the triplet of tasks [[Abundant, deficient and perfect number classifications]], they do form a tight triplet, but I am probably pushing it cos I started it. Could it stay guys? (I am definitely not impartial - would be nice to have one champion though in what I hope will be a debate) --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 19:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
::::Yes I see those, but like I said, those could easily be made using the sum of the old factors task definition and "2n" on the right side of the formulas. Seems like "2 pi" and "tau" to me, but let's see if anyone else has an opinion on whether this task should stay. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] ([[User talk:Mwn3d|talk]]) 19:37, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
::::I like the classification task, but this one seems like a very small change vs. divisors ([[Factors of an integer]]). If we have this, then why not restricted divisors (remove 1 and n) as well? It seems like the obvious implementation here is "get divisors using the other task, then remove n" which isn't very interesting (in my opinion). [[User:Danaj|Danaj]] ([[User talk:Danaj|talk]]) 14:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
== Definition ==
| |||