Anonymous user
Talk:Proof: Difference between revisions
→Quantifiers: re
No edit summary |
(→Quantifiers: re) |
||
Line 216:
::::::: Typically "not even wrong" indicates a lack of testability. It's not clear how that is relevant here. I am guessing, though, that you disagree with me about the meaning of the word type. But if that were the case I think you should present your own definition.
::::::: My suspicion though, is that in this case "not even wrong" means the same thing as "right". --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 00:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
:::::::: Most of your comments here consist semantically empty rambling. I therefore cannot possibly give a genuine reply to them, they are so incoherent I cannot even state what is wrong them, ergo "not even wrong". —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 13:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
::: > However, in a computer program, an infinity cannot be implemented
| |||