Anonymous user
Talk:Probabilistic choice: Difference between revisions
I don't think that works right.
(→J solution: another way of counting) |
(I don't think that works right.) |
||
Line 11:
:--[[User:Gaaijz|Gaaijz]] 18:41, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
:The problem I see with this is that it operates on the assumption that the actual proportions will fit the target proportions. This is to be tested, so cannot be assumed. The flaw is most clear when very small runs occur, in which cases the actual proportions are usually not in the same order as the targets. In such cases the code proposed above will pair proportions inaccurately. Nevertheless, I do appreciate being reminded of reflexive keyed-copy. --[[User:TBH|TBH]] 19:18, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
| |||