Talk:Primes - allocate descendants to their ancestors: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
: You have made it clear in your code, and you've spent considerable time explaining to me in the comments here how I am wrong. And I appreciate that. But what I'm really looking for is an adequate task description. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 17:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC) |
: You have made it clear in your code, and you've spent considerable time explaining to me in the comments here how I am wrong. And I appreciate that. But what I'm really looking for is an adequate task description. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 17:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC) |
||
- No problem, everybody can do mistakes. I don't blame you, since you agree with me that 1 number can have 0 or 1 direct ancestor. |
|||
- It is specified. I gave the greatest number 3<sup>33</sup>. 3<sup>33</sup> is a direct descendant of 99. |
|||
But I'm good prince, I concede it, for more clarity and for newbies. I replace "all descendants" by "direct descendants". |
|||
The code didn't change that much since the original post. I'm surpise that you suddenly see it clearer. |
|||
But, ok, it's a good start. |
|||
- Considerable time ? No. I spend a few minutes between 2 supports, only, when I have some spare time. |
|||
I think you surely spend more time, trying to find flaws, than what I spend to teach you. |
|||
It is very relaxing to teach others. |
|||
--[[User:Old man|Old man]] ([[User talk:Old man|talk]]) 18:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
==Parent-Child relationship== |
==Parent-Child relationship== |
||