Talk:Primes - allocate descendants to their ancestors: Difference between revisions

Undo revision 201576 by Old man (talk)
(Undo revision 201576 by Old man (talk))
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 197:
 
--[[User:Old man|Old man]] ([[User talk:Old man|talk]]) 18:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 
: Actually I was trying to find the definitions of your terms - I'd rather work forward from the definitions than reverse engineer your code. What you see as me trying to find flaws was, from my point of view, an attempt to piece together a set of definitions which would satisfy you and be consistent with my understanding of the words. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 19:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 
 
Could you be more specific ?
 
--[[User:Old man|Old man]] ([[User talk:Old man|talk]]) 11:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 
See [[Primes_-_allocate_descendants_to_their_ancestors#Definition_of_terms]] for my current understanding. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 19:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 
==Parent-Child relationship==
Line 207 ⟶ 216:
 
P.S. I do note that after pondering #thedress, the answer might well be "blue and black"
 
 
:Hi,
 
:I see what you mean, but with such reasoning, humanity has absolutely no future.
 
:Personally, I'd prefer to discuss normality. I posted, 46 has 557 children and you'd like, 46 has 557 parents.
:I can say one thing : What an orgy!
:Why not ? LOL. Excellent! LOL.
:Thanks for this little touch of humor. This was missing.
 
:I didn't see the signature button, before today.
:I copied and pasted the signature from post to post, changing date and time.
:But, my signature still does not appear "blue and black", with the button.
 
--[[User:Old man|Old man]] ([[User talk:Old man|talk]]) 19:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 
: To make your signature appear blue and black, you'll probably want to click through where it's red, and then save something on the page where you land. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 19:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Anonymous user