Talk:Prime conspiracy: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 72:
 
::::: After rereading the task description, I have also removed '''Rem : i and j are in (1,3,7,9) .''' from the task description since that doesn't make sense. The problem is that the task asks for frequencies, but the frequencies indicated are only valid frequencies if the remaining i and j values are considered. (Though I suppose it could be argued that the task example rounds those numbers to too few decimal points for that to be noticeable.) --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 22:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 
-----
 
Am I correct in assuming that there is   no   prime that ends in the decimal digit '''1''' that transits to the next prime which ends in a decimal digit '''2'''?     '''Pascal''' has this as part of its output;   would this be considered an error (incorrect output)?.   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 02:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)