Anonymous user
Talk:Prime conspiracy: Difference between revisions
→primes ending in 2 or 5: added more comments in a talk section.
m (→primes ending in 2 or 5: changed a plural spelling.) |
(→primes ending in 2 or 5: added more comments in a talk section.) |
||
Line 64:
:::: I also (regarding REXX) didn't show the transitions for primes ending in '''2''' or '''5''', as the task (apparently) didn't require it (as it didn't reflect those in the example output). Since there are exactly three of those (total), it didn't seem that it should/would be beneficial just to add those particular counts to the output as they'll just appear as constants (for any list showing more than three or more primes). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
-----
... Although, this task ''did'' say: ... ''for '''any''' pair of successive primes, ... '' <br><br>(the bold '''any''' was my highlighting, er, ... enbolding). I think the '''any''' should be reenforced, or a statement should be added that any primes ending in '''2''' or '''5''' should (or could) be excluded from the output (to save clutter and also not have existing programs changed). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
| |||