Anonymous user
Talk:Prime conspiracy: Difference between revisions
m
→numbers in the example for the task (deprecated): added another comment to an (almost) dead section.
(changed the title of the first talk section.) |
m (→numbers in the example for the task (deprecated): added another comment to an (almost) dead section.) |
||
Line 47:
:: Ok. Of course, the Pascal result also does not show the transitions involving the prime numbers 2 and 5. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 00:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
::: And also, it doesn't show the transitions involving the prime number 3 and the number 5. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
| |||