Talk:Prime conspiracy: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
::::: I have updated the task's example's numbers to match their description. This seemed to make more sense than changing the description to match the example. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 22:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC) |
::::: I have updated the task's example's numbers to match their description. This seemed to make more sense than changing the description to match the example. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 22:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
::::: After rereading the task description, I have also removed '''Rem : i and j are in (1,3,7,9) .''' from the task description since that doesn't make sense. The problem is that the task asks for frequencies, but the frequencies indicated are only valid frequencies if the remaining i and j values are considered. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 22:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC) |
::::: After rereading the task description, I have also removed '''Rem : i and j are in (1,3,7,9) .''' from the task description since that doesn't make sense. The problem is that the task asks for frequencies, but the frequencies indicated are only valid frequencies if the remaining i and j values are considered. (Though I suppose it could be argued that the task example rounds those numbers to too few decimal points for that to be noticable.) --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 22:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC) |
||