Talk:Prime conspiracy: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 20:52, 22 March 2016 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger (→‎primes ending in 2 or 5: added more comments in a talk section.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:45, 22 March 2016 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) m (→‎primes ending in 2 or 5) Newer edit →
Line 68:		Line 68:

	... Although, this task   ''did''   say:       ...   ''for '''any''' pair of successive primes, ... '' <br><br>(the bold   '''any'''   was my highlighting, er, ... enbolding).   I think the   '''any'''   should be reenforced, or a statement should be added that any primes ending in '''2''' or '''5''' should (or could) be excluded from the output   (to save clutter and also not have existing programs changed).   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 20:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)		... Although, this task   ''did''   say:       ...   ''for '''any''' pair of successive primes, ... '' <br><br>(the bold   '''any'''   was my highlighting, er, ... enbolding).   I think the   '''any'''   should be reenforced, or a statement should be added that any primes ending in '''2''' or '''5''' should (or could) be excluded from the output   (to save clutter and also not have existing programs changed).   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 20:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

			::::: I have updated the task's example's numbers to match their description. This seemed to make more sense than changing the description to match the example. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 22:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)