Talk:Prime conspiracy: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 23:50, 21 March 2016 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger (→‎numbers in the example for the task: added some followup, elided a timing output.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:51, 21 March 2016 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (→‎numbers in the example for the task: added whitespace.) Newer edit →
Line 33:		Line 33:

	</strike>		</strike>


	Never mind, I found the problem   (had to do with the calculation of the upper bound for the sieve).   I did think it strange that my calculations for 1,000,000 primes was correct, but not for 10,000. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 23:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)		Never mind, I found the problem   (had to do with the calculation of the upper bound for the sieve).   I did think it strange that my calculations for 1,000,000 primes was correct, but not for 10,000. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 23:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)