Talk:Prime conspiracy: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Propose change in output format: new section) |
|||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
: Yes: 2 is the only prime that ends in decimal digit 2, and it's the first prime, so 2 can never be a successor. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 02:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC) |
: Yes: 2 is the only prime that ends in decimal digit 2, and it's the first prime, so 2 can never be a successor. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 02:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Propose change in output format == |
|||
Only primes above 6 are to be included. This simplifies things. We're only left with 1,3,7,9, so the output can be made much more compact, like so: |
|||
<pre> |
|||
10000 first primes. Transitions prime % 10 → next-prime % 10. |
|||
counts frequencies, % |
|||
1 3 7 9 1 3 7 9 total |
|||
1 → 365, 833, 889, 397 14.69, 33.53, 35.79, 15.98 24.85 |
|||
3 → 529, 324, 754, 907 21.04, 12.89, 29.99, 36.08 25.15 |
|||
7 → 655, 722, 323, 808 26.12, 28.79, 12.88, 32.22 25.09 |
|||
9 → 935, 635, 541, 379 37.55, 25.50, 21.73, 15.22 24.91 |
|||
</pre> |
|||
And frequencies should be calculated separately for each starting digit, so the 4 frequencies for each digit should sum up to 100%. Also add the total percentage for the four transitions together for each digit. |
|||
This way the results are much more visually apparent. |