Revision as of 07:23, 2 April 2021 (view source) Hout (talk \| contribs) (→‎==Acceptable Solutions ?==) ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:25, 2 April 2021 (view source) Hout (talk \| contribs) (→‎Acceptable Solutions ?) Newer edit →
Line 383: :# hostile "improvement" notices applied to code that is working and linted :# deletion of all type comments, and their replacement with compiler type notation which requires debugging and is less easily readable :# multiply repeated deletions of attempts to show two approaches side by side. :# rhetoric dismissing a particular approach as "not to be be encouraged" and not to be used with a particular language. Line 394: Particular suggestions have been: #:# A new language code, perhaps some variant of Functional Python, Curried Python etc #:# The labelling scheme used by Wren, leading to path names like Task::Python::Functional::Folding Paddy or Donald, you have not yet had a chance to respond to these proposals.

Talk:Practical numbers: Difference between revisions

Talk:Practical numbers (view source)