Talk:Practical numbers: Difference between revisions
Divergent approaches are a form of '''wealth''' for Rosetta Code, not a source of threat.
(Divergent approaches are a form of '''wealth''' for Rosetta Code, not a source of threat.) |
|||
Line 61:
: I think we have a larger problem here ...
:[[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 21:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
:Incidentally, you make a statement about what I "want to do" (apparently this is "present my code as idiomatic Python")
: Well, how do you know ? Have you considered '''asking''' me what I want to do ?
: The answer is very simple, I want to contribute, to Rosetta Code, '''well-linted and reliable''' examples of how problems can be solved, by using Python to define and compose pure functions.
: I am very much aware that that is a minority approach. I happen, however, to find that it is a very '''good''', and actually rather interesting approach, which makes code more reliable, and faster to rewrite and refactor, and which increases levels of code reuse.
: I am certainly '''not''' alone in finding that to be the case. There's a whole literature on functional programming in Python.
: Others will take a different approach. The Rosetta value lies precisely in helping a person with a grounding in one approach to learning another.
: Divergent approaches are a form of '''wealth''' for Rosetta Code, not a source of threat.
:[[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 21:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
== Haskell type hints are not valid Python==
| |||