Talk:Practical numbers: Difference between revisions
→you've debugged them all – wonderful !!
Line 30:
::: I am '''very''' pleased, however, to see that you have now improved that typing to the point where it is no longer misleading and obscuring.
::: Very helpful to have both versions in parallel, in the proper Rosetta manner, for comparison. They aim for different things. Clarity for the reader in one case, formal type checking in the other. Thank you for putting in the effort to learn the type-hint notation and to debug that example. Enjoy !! I look forward to seeing you use more pure value-returning functions :-) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 09:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
:::: In fact it looks like you've debugged all those compiler type hints – wonderful !! I hope that didn't take too long :-( [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
==Python: Comment on type hints for the functional example==
| |||