Talk:Practical numbers: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 221:
:: Thanks – a new language code is an interesting and constructive thought, though it might also risk the fundamental health of Rosetta Code, by working around, and implicitly normalizing, this slightly dangerous and exogenous conception of "Encouraging" and "Discouraging" particular approaches, rather than simply displaying divergent approaches side by side, so that those familiar with one approach can learn about another.
I agree there is little reason to create a category of Python solutions based on how the code is documented. It seems to me that the
main way the solutions using Haskell style comments actually differ is the tendency to use currying to write multiple functions taking single arguments, replacing the usual Python way of making a single function taking multiple arguments. It does make sense to me to have someone create and index the subcategory of Python solutions that code in that way. --[[User:Wherrera|Wherrera]] ([[User talk:Wherrera|talk]]) 18:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
:: See https://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code:Village_Pump/Discouraging_approaches
| |||