Anonymous user
Talk:Polymorphism: Difference between revisions
→Fortran: new section
(How to change, and another suggestion) |
(→Fortran: new section) |
||
Line 79:
Porsche Pinto</pre>
:There could be a "start" method in each class. For Car, it could print "vroom vroom", Porsche prints "go, baby, go!", and Pinto prints "clunk clunk". Then make a collection of Car objects (one Car, one Pinto, and one Porsche) and call the start method on each one for proof. Is that an OK idea or is it too complex?--[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
== Fortran ==
I've removed omit from Fortran since this task can be implemented a lot better than the C code example. Using modules, overloading and derived types Fortran "seems" a lot more object oriented than C... Moreover... I've read from wikipedia [[wp:Type polymorphism]] that polymorphism is not necessarily OOP-related, even though the task talks about "classes"; I think Fortran can have ''easily'' ad-hoc polymorphism (but I am always unsure about any formal definition of a language feature...) --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 09:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||