Talk:Pointers and references: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 00:44, 3 August 2010

Perhaps there should be a cannonical set of "common operations" here? --Rdm 18:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Since each language has slightly different semantics for pointers and/or references, I don't think you can make a canonical list of "common operations" which is language independent. --Ce 18:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Are the semantic differences classifiable? For language operations which are "X-like", can some set of Xs be identified?--Michael Mol 00:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:06, 2 August 2010 (view source) Ce (talk \| contribs) (A canonical list is probably not possible) ← Older edit		Revision as of 00:44, 3 August 2010 (view source) MikeMol (talk \| contribs) (Classifiable?) Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: Since each language has slightly different semantics for pointers and/or references, I don't think you can make a canonical list of "common operations" which is language independent. --[[User:Ce\|Ce]] 18:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)		: Since each language has slightly different semantics for pointers and/or references, I don't think you can make a canonical list of "common operations" which is language independent. --[[User:Ce\|Ce]] 18:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
			:: Are the semantic differences classifiable? For language operations which are "X-like", can some set of Xs be identified?--[[User:Short Circuit\|Michael Mol]] 00:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)