Anonymous user
Talk:Playfair cipher: Difference between revisions
m
→Inadequate spec: corrected a wrong word use.
(Disagreement about the way to process duplicate letters.) |
m (→Inadequate spec: corrected a wrong word use.) |
||
Line 72:
::I'm not saying that this is right, nor that yours is wrong. I am saying that the spec is not clear about how to handle this case. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 18:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
::: Right or wrong, the REXX version does encrypt/decrypt the above two messages correctly. It's not 100% successful in handling all cases that contain replicated characters however. As to the specs, yes, I agree, it's rather fuzzy, especially about the part that states "... dropping any extra "X"es, or "Q"s that do not make sense in the final message... That's pretty hard to do
== Disagreement about the way to process duplicate letters ==
|