Anonymous user
Talk:Play recorded sounds: Difference between revisions
the existing examples are good
No edit summary |
(the existing examples are good) |
||
Line 3:
:: I'd be tempted to say keep with the language focus used elsewhere. Overall site consistency is a good goal. :-) —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
General reply: On reflection, it would probably be better to split up the task so the examples of any one are more all of the same thing. However, I don't think categorizing by language rather than audio facility is appropriate because audio is not ''usually'' a language feature and the details depend far more on the audio facility than what language you talk to it in. Also, [[User:Short Circuit]] has expressed interest (on IRC yesterday) in expanding Rosetta Code to other types of comparison: libraries, algorithms, paradigms. (And a clarification by example: The two examples currently on the page, categorized under C# and Tcl headings, are not contrary to my suggestion because they are using (I assume) language-provided audio libraries.) --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 19:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
| |||