Anonymous user
Talk:Play recorded sounds: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(let's keep it consistent with the rest of RC) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2:
: Agree. Moreover, I find not so clear the required/suggested cathegorization: should we use as == header the "lib/system" used and as === the language? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 15:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
:: I'd be tempted to say keep with the language focus used elsewhere. Overall site consistency is a good goal. :-) —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
General reply: On reflection, it would probably be better to split up the task so the examples of any one are more all of the same thing. However, I don't think categorizing by language rather than audio facility is appropriate because audio is not ''usually'' a language feature and the details depend far more on the audio facility than what language you talk to it in. Also, [[User:Short Circuit]] has expressed interest (on IRC yesterday) in expanding Rosetta Code to other types of comparison: libraries, algorithms, paradigms. --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 19:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
| |||