Talk:Play recorded sounds: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(to me, only playback (mixing optional)) |
(let's keep it consistent with the rest of RC) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think this task is massively overcomplex at the moment. Too many features mixed into one. This task should instead be just doing simple playback (and possibly mixing of multiple sounds) and the other bits moved to additional tasks. This will make it both easier to implement and easier to read for specific features. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
I think this task is massively overcomplex at the moment. Too many features mixed into one. This task should instead be just doing simple playback (and possibly mixing of multiple sounds) and the other bits moved to additional tasks. This will make it both easier to implement and easier to read for specific features. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
: Agree. Moreover, I find not so clear the required/suggested cathegorization: should we use as == header the "lib/system" used and as === the language? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 15:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
: Agree. Moreover, I find not so clear the required/suggested cathegorization: should we use as == header the "lib/system" used and as === the language? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 15:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
:: I'd be tempted to say keep with the language focus used elsewhere. Overall site consistency is a good goal. :-) —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:33, 11 June 2009
I think this task is massively overcomplex at the moment. Too many features mixed into one. This task should instead be just doing simple playback (and possibly mixing of multiple sounds) and the other bits moved to additional tasks. This will make it both easier to implement and easier to read for specific features. —Donal Fellows 08:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Agree. Moreover, I find not so clear the required/suggested cathegorization: should we use as == header the "lib/system" used and as === the language? --ShinTakezou 15:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'd be tempted to say keep with the language focus used elsewhere. Overall site consistency is a good goal. :-) —Donal Fellows 15:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)