Revision as of 09:48, 19 August 2019 (view source) Tigerofdarkness (talk \| contribs) (Some observations) ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:32, 19 August 2019 (view source) Tigerofdarkness (talk \| contribs) (→‎Final Digits) Newer edit →
Line 11: Looking at the results, I see that there appear to be no Pierpont primes of the second kind ending with 9, but 9 is a relatively common final digit of the Pierpont numbers of the first kind. The distribution of the other possible final digits also appears to differ between them. Maybe showing the numbers of each possible final digit would be interesting. Also, the First kind are clearly more frequent than the second kind. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness\|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness\|talk]]) 09:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC) ::Though thinking about it, the first kind can never end in 1 and the second kind can vever end in 9... --[[User:Tigerofdarkness\|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness\|talk]]) 11:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Pierpont primes: Difference between revisions

Talk:Pierpont primes (view source)