Talk:Pierpont primes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Some observations) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Looking at the results, I see that there appear to be no Pierpont primes of the second kind ending with 9, but 9 is a relatively common final digit of the Pierpont numbers of the first kind. The distribution of the other possible final digits also appears to differ between them. |
Looking at the results, I see that there appear to be no Pierpont primes of the second kind ending with 9, but 9 is a relatively common final digit of the Pierpont numbers of the first kind. The distribution of the other possible final digits also appears to differ between them. |
||
Maybe showing the numbers of each possible final digit would be interesting. Also, the First kind are clearly more frequent than the second kind. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 09:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC) |
Maybe showing the numbers of each possible final digit would be interesting. Also, the First kind are clearly more frequent than the second kind. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 09:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC) |
||
::Though thinking about it, the first kind can never end in 1 and the second kind can vever end in 9... --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 11:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC) |