Talk:Percolation/Site percolation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Tcl percolation?: Foolish is foolish) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Why remove that feature Donal? Seeing a successful percolation is much more involving for the viewer than not. Also the other examples have that feature, making Tcl the odd one out? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 01:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC) |
::Why remove that feature Donal? Seeing a successful percolation is much more involving for the viewer than not. Also the other examples have that feature, making Tcl the odd one out? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 01:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
::: Because it's a foolish requirement. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 09:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:44, 9 September 2013
Tcl percolation?
Hi, it seems as if the Tcl output does not show a successful percolation through a 15x15 grid? --Paddy3118 (talk) 16:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. It's random, and around the threshold level where it can go either way. Requiring a successful percolation is lame. I'll remove that word from the task description. –Donal Fellows (talk) 23:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Why remove that feature Donal? Seeing a successful percolation is much more involving for the viewer than not. Also the other examples have that feature, making Tcl the odd one out? --Paddy3118 (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Because it's a foolish requirement. –Donal Fellows (talk) 09:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Why remove that feature Donal? Seeing a successful percolation is much more involving for the viewer than not. Also the other examples have that feature, making Tcl the odd one out? --Paddy3118 (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)