Talk:Pascal matrix generation: Difference between revisions
apologize and justify "functions"
m (→task clarification: added a query.) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (apologize and justify "functions") |
||
Line 7:
:: Should I remove the 2<sup>nd</sup> REXX entry then? ... and will you be marking other entries as "needing improvement" or somesuch? The 2<sup>nd</sup> Rexx entry uses a singular function to generate all three forms of Pascal matrices. However, in its defense, it does read better. But, a lot of whitespace added to the 1<sup>st</sup> would add a significant vertical whitespace. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 06:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
::: Well, I started that (after my sloppy reading of the task specs). My function<b>s</b> are pascal & comb although comb is, strictly speaking, not a <b>function</b> :-) --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 07:35, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
===range of numbers===
| |||