Talk:Pascal matrix generation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→range of numbers: added a response.) |
m (→task clarification: added a query.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Individual functions was my intention. Is there really that much to gain by having one function parametrised with the output required? |
:Individual functions was my intention. Is there really that much to gain by having one function parametrised with the output required? |
||
:I guess if there is documented language style for having one parameterised function in a similar area then it might be good to reference the standard library function(s) that you copying the style of then have the one function, but three functions is what the task expects. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 05:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC) |
:I guess if there is documented language style for having one parameterised function in a similar area then it might be good to reference the standard library function(s) that you copying the style of then have the one function, but three functions is what the task expects. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 05:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
:: Should I remove the 2<sup>nd</sup> REXX entry then? ... and will you be marking other entries as "needing improvement" or somesuch? The 2<sup>nd</sup> Rexx entry uses a singular function to generate all three forms of Pascal matrices. However, in its defense, it does read better. But, a lot of whitespace added to the 1<sup>st</sup> would add a significant vertical whitespace. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 06:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC) |
|||
===range of numbers=== |
===range of numbers=== |
||