Anonymous user
Talk:Partial function application: Difference between revisions
→Current task description is a bit odd: re
Line 312:
::: This is beginning to sound like a Haskell-specific concept, rather than an algorithmic concept. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 17:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
:::: Well yes, partial application is a programming language concept, not an algorithm or design pattern. But it can be "done" a number of languages. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 17:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
::: Using common sense and discussion? I don't think the task should be overspecified either. For example, specifying that you have to define a function similar to Python's <code>partial</code> would rule out ML's and Haskell's implicit partial application or perhaps a clever, but reasonable, trick involving C's preprocessor or C++'s templates. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 17:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
| |||