Anonymous user
Talk:Partial function application: Difference between revisions
→Proposal for new task description: re
(→Is D correct?: comment) |
|||
Line 207:
:::Somehow, I do notice the similarity between currying and PFA, but unlike you, I see it as a strong reason to have two, contrasting tasks. What to do? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 03:28, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Here are samples in Haskell and Python:
:::: I think it's somewhat more than a similarity: in the Haskell example we have that <code>papply2</code> = <code>curry</code> and <code>papply3</code> ≈ <code>curry3</code>. In the Ruby partial application and currying are both implemented by <code>Prox#curry</code>. It would be fun to see how a <code>curry</code> function in Python looks that works for functions of any arity like <code>partial</code> does (if this is possible) and how similar their definitions would be. Their currently isn't a task on [[Currying]]. Would it be a problem to create a new task [[Currying and partial application]] or does Rosetta Code strive to avoid duplicated and overlapping entries? —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 09:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
<lang haskell>
| |||