Anonymous user
Talk:Partial function application: Difference between revisions
→Is D correct?: Make plain that D doesn't have it.
(→Proposal for new task description: I'd prefer separation.) |
(→Is D correct?: Make plain that D doesn't have it.) |
||
Line 173:
And in the D version fs() is a templated function. It's the way you write generic code in such languages.
: HI, some language features are ''ways'' of doing things - like list comprehensions, or case statements. It would be wrong to not use a case statement if one is called for in a task, but in these cases I think it would be acceptable to either:
:# Omit a language if it does not support the feature.
:# Or explicitely state that the feature is missing from the language then go on to explain your languages idiomatic way of supporting the feature.
: Since you state the D solution is idiomatic, then if the comment was changed to something like:
:: ''"D language does not support PFA, but the following solution ..."''
: would be OK by me. What do others think? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
== Proposal for new task description ==
| |||