Talk:Parsing/RPN calculator algorithm: Difference between revisions

Line 42:
 
::::: But I also want to get some other people's opinions on this - I know other people have disagreed with me on other issues, so I don't think I should be the sole voice here. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 07:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 
 
:::::: I see your point about the optional option encouraging non-comparable implementations. I hadn't considered that. By "extra credit part" do you mean, it would not be an optional feature of the algorithm, but like a secondary, extra credit implementation? E.g., something like,
 
::::::: >Task: Implement X using Y and Z. Extra credit: implement another version of X using Y and Z that logs intermediary stages of the data.
 
:::::: If this is a correct interpretation of your suggestion, I think it is a very good idea! It addresses all of my concerns.
 
:::::: I am fine waiting for some time. I created that Village Pump page in the hopes of soliciting feedback, but none has yet been given. What other steps should I take to get a wider chorus of voices chiming? Thanks for your feedback and guidance! --[[User:Abathologist|Abathologist]] ([[User talk:Abathologist|talk]]) 03:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)