Talk:Parsing/RPN calculator algorithm: Difference between revisions

Line 34:
 
:::: (Do you think we should migrate the bulk of this discussion to the Village Pump page, since it all about the general approach rather any particular implementation?)--[[User:Abathologist|Abathologist]] ([[User talk:Abathologist|talk]]) 04:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 
::::: This discussion is long enough, already, that I don't think it should go on village pump. If you feel dropping a small section there that links here, that could work.
 
::::: I don't like the idea of making it optional - that just seems lazy. The problem being that the task results would then be less comparable, and the whole point of this site is to create examples which are comparable across languages.
 
::::: It's ok to object to this aspect of the tasks, though, and to recommend that most tasks avoid such things, and to also require a bit more work on the task author's part (such as making it a part of the page title). And, I suppose, it's also all right to set up the task such that the logging is an "extra credit" part of the task rather than a core part.
 
::::: But I also want to get some other people's opinions on this - I know other people have disagreed with me on other issues, so I don't think I should be the sole voice here. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 07:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
6,951

edits