Talk:Parsing/RPN calculator algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 03:09, 3 October 2016 (view source) rosettacode>Abathologist (→‎Extraneous Requirements) ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:10, 3 October 2016 (view source) rosettacode>Abathologist (→‎Extraneous Requirements) Newer edit →
Line 42:		Line 42:

	::::: But I also want to get some other people's opinions on this - I know other people have disagreed with me on other issues, so I don't think I should be the sole voice here. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 07:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)		::::: But I also want to get some other people's opinions on this - I know other people have disagreed with me on other issues, so I don't think I should be the sole voice here. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 07:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)


	:::::: I see your point about the optional option encouraging non-comparable implementations. I hadn't considered that. By "extra credit part" do you mean, it would not be an optional feature of the algorithm, but like a secondary, extra credit implementation? E.g., something like,		:::::: I see your point about the optional option encouraging non-comparable implementations. I hadn't considered that. By "extra credit part" do you mean, it would not be an optional feature of the algorithm, but like a secondary, extra credit implementation? E.g., something like,