Anonymous user
Talk:Parse EBNF: Difference between revisions
→ANTLR parser EBNF or ISO standard EBNF?: ISO is standard
(→ANTLR parser EBNF or ISO standard EBNF?: and ideas for a →Rewrite?: .) |
(→ANTLR parser EBNF or ISO standard EBNF?: ISO is standard) |
||
Line 40:
== ANTLR parser EBNF or ISO standard EBNF? ==
There is a [http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-14977.pdf difference]. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
: Oh, in that case: let's go for ISO EBNF (though perhaps without the rules on exceptions; they're non-trivial to implement and the standard actually says that no grammar may be written that ''requires'' them, making them a shorthand form only). –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
== Rewrite?==
| |||