Talk:Pandigital prime: Difference between revisions
→How about ...: +1 for doing both.
(→How about ...: +1 for doing both.) |
|||
Line 106:
:Why not do both? As in: a pandigitial makes use of all the digits 1 to n, a pandigital0 uses all the digits 0 to n. Added a "with 0" section to the Phix entry, even with the full inner workings of both the output is still quite short. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 10:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
:: Yeah, doing both seems a better idea to me and, if we make the '0' version optional, the existing solutions will still be valid. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 10:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
| |||