Anonymous user
Talk:Pandigital prime: Difference between revisions
→Direct copy of Project Euler problems
Line 29:
:::::<br>Unfortunately, I think either the first or second option should be adopted. We should certainly say no-more in future.
:::::--[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 20:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
::::::I’m a Project Euler member but I didn’t remember the special rule for problems 1 to 100. I found it when I looked more precisely to the rules in the “about” page. As there is some flexibility for these problems, reusing them is not a really a violation of Project Euler rules. And, in fact, if there as discussions about the algorithms, we respect Project Euler requirements.
::::::So, even if I still think than reusing he problem without any added value is a bit unfair, I’m now more forgiving. I suggest that we avoid Project Euler tasks if possible, except if we have some added value to offer. And that in any case, we refuse tasks which are not from the first hundred ones as it would be a clear violation of Project Euler rules. To be honest, this is only a policy position. You can solve any task without being a member and, so, are not committed to follow, even morally, Project Euler rules.
::::::For existing tasks, I finally propose to keep them. At least, the limits of what is acceptable are somewhat more clear.
::::::--[[User:Lscrd|lscrd]] ([[User talk:Lscrd|talk]]) 21:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
| |||