Talk:Pandigital prime: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::::But I’m not sure that simply referring to some Project Euler problem without any added value respects the requirements. |
::::But I’m not sure that simply referring to some Project Euler problem without any added value respects the requirements. |
||
::::--[[User:Lscrd|lscrd]] ([[User talk:Lscrd|talk]]) 19:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC) |
::::--[[User:Lscrd|lscrd]] ([[User talk:Lscrd|talk]]) 19:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC) |
||
<br> |
|||
:::::I see your point - I'm not a Project Euler member and was not aware of their request re-solutions to their problems. I agree this is worrying and distasteful. |
|||
:::::However, looking at the Sum multiples of 3 and 5 task, it was created in 2013 and has thus been precendent setting for 8 years. Paddy flagged the (possible) Project Euler origin in 2013 but that didn't stop 102 languages providing solutions.<br> |
|||
:::::As far as I can see, we have three options (not that it is up to me):<br><br> |
|||
:::::* Delete all Project Euler related tasks, no matter how many solutions they have and ban such tasks in future. |
|||
:::::* Accept where we are but ban anything from Project Euler in future. |
|||
:::::* Continue in our mis-guided ways. |
|||
:::::<br>Unfortunately, I think either the first or second option should be adopted. We should certainly say no-more in future. |
|||
:::::--[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 20:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC) |