Revision as of 16:51, 9 March 2021 (view source) Petelomax (talk \| contribs) (→‎Everything is wrong: corrected history evidence) ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:00, 9 March 2021 (view source) Petelomax (talk \| contribs) (→‎Everything is wrong) Newer edit →
Line 8: Even if it’s right, I question the point of such providing such a solution. It’s mostly reverse-engineered guess-work from a solution generated by actual exhaustive search. Could we purge the page to only keeping solutions that actually find the solutions through exhaustive search? [[User:Monarchdodra\|Monarchdodra]] ([[User talk:Monarchdodra\|talk]]) 12:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC) : As per https://oeis.org/history?seq=A058986 the sequence was changed Dec 5th 2020. I've added a modified version. If everyone agrees and someone marks my entry along with everyone else's as incorrect, I'll replace the original. : The suggestion there is no point in a fast estimate method is frankly outrageously ridiculous. Sure it needs a caveat (as I tried to put on the Phix entry), maybe in this case it should go in the task description itself. Besides, since the whole point of RC is to compare languages, a task that allows comparison of both fast and exhaustive approaches has more merit than just exhaustive. --[[User:Petelomax\|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax\|talk]]) 16:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Pancake numbers: Difference between revisions

Talk:Pancake numbers (view source)