Talk:Palindrome detection: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Prolog) |
m (→Prolog: cut spurious text from a previous writing, when it did not work because of me) |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
The functions you used for strings are in SWI Prolog, but not in GNU Prolog, so I can't test it, but the "logic" seems logical to me:D --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 21:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
The functions you used for strings are in SWI Prolog, but not in GNU Prolog, so I can't test it, but the "logic" seems logical to me:D --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 21:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
Reading here and there I've realized that what we call String in Prolog could be simply called atom, and it exists atom_length/2 and atom_concat/3 |
Reading here and there I've realized that what we call String in Prolog could be simply called atom, and it exists atom_length/2 and atom_concat/3; atom_concat(A1,A2,A3) is true if A3 (unbound atom) is the concatenation of A1 and A2 (bound atoms, i.e. known atoms?). |
||
The code compiles (with gplc, the GNU prolog compiler), but when I try pali('atom'), it says |
The code compiles (with gplc, the GNU prolog compiler), but when I try pali('atom'), it says |
||