Talk:Padovan n-step number sequences: Difference between revisions

Line 17:
I have say that these outbursts seem to concentrate around Functional Python drafts which happen to possess any qualities which the procedural version lacks – sometimes reliability, sometimes (as here, I think) clarity of expression, sometimes even crude execution speed.
 
That they are motivationmotivated by animus is absolutely clear. My strong impression is that the sources of this animus lie elsewhere, and that similar patterns are being played out in home life and work life. If they are to be harnessed here in the form of creative contribution, rather than destructive and persecutory vandalism, then they simply need to flow into additional drafts, rather than into mere attacks and polemics. Minimum adult standards please. Rosetta code deserves that. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 17:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
9,655

edits